In an article by Mike Cohn and on the subject to the Review ceremony
"After all completed product backlog items have been demonstrated, discuss key events or problems that occurred during the sprint."
I often see confusion between what should be discussed here (In the review) and what should be covered in the Retrospective.
Does anyone have any useful guidelines that could be followed to keep the separation between these?
eg what should be discussed in the review/what shouldn't etc
