The question: When a Continuous Integration build fails, who ideally ensures the build is repaired?
The sugested answer: The person who broke the build
The confusion: Currently it suggests that each individual has some particular 'ideal' responsibility in the team. It may not have beenas confusing even if it satted who 'usually' fixes the build instead of 'ideally ensures' - because itis most likely the developer who made the last change would be the first to notice it.
PS: I would have personally preferred highlighting collective ownership - saying whoever in the development team first noticed it as broken fixes it - if required with help from the person who last made a change that led the build to break.
Any thoughts on how I should understand this or any light you can throw on something that I may have misunderstood.
The sugested answer: The person who broke the build
The confusion: Currently it suggests that each individual has some particular 'ideal' responsibility in the team. It may not have beenas confusing even if it satted who 'usually' fixes the build instead of 'ideally ensures' - because itis most likely the developer who made the last change would be the first to notice it.
PS: I would have personally preferred highlighting collective ownership - saying whoever in the development team first noticed it as broken fixes it - if required with help from the person who last made a change that led the build to break.
Any thoughts on how I should understand this or any light you can throw on something that I may have misunderstood.