Hi
I failed the exam and am struggling with certain types of questions that just dont seem to be in the guide or books I have purchased.
For example (and the question is coming from memory) -
If the development team have an issue delivering their increment then what can they do? i.e can they move the work to another sprint or do they get advice with the product owner? Are they allowed to change the team to bring in someone who can help ? Can they just to best efforts and bring it up in the sprint review?
The guides seems to cover the definitions pretty well, but does not provide any clarity on exceptions or when things dont go to plan and the assessment seems to throw these types of scenarios.
From reading the guide I can only say that:
1) The development team are self managing so they should be able to bring in help if they choose.
2)The scrum master can help removes impediments - but that wasnt an option
3) The product owner can possibly help re-prioritise - but not sure why the product owner would need to be involved - possibly unless it was relating to reprioritising. Not sure who drives this decision and where accountability is.
4) Not sure how this situation is supposed to even happen because if the increment can be delivered then it wont meet the sprint goal.
I think I am confused coming from years of enterprise waterfall development. I cant seem to make sense of the situation.
My best guess at it would be that faced with not being able to deliver the increment they would do what ever it took i,e getting external advice or bringing in a specialist. This implies that they are self managing and accountable.
I failed the exam and am struggling with certain types of questions that just dont seem to be in the guide or books I have purchased.
For example (and the question is coming from memory) -
If the development team have an issue delivering their increment then what can they do? i.e can they move the work to another sprint or do they get advice with the product owner? Are they allowed to change the team to bring in someone who can help ? Can they just to best efforts and bring it up in the sprint review?
The guides seems to cover the definitions pretty well, but does not provide any clarity on exceptions or when things dont go to plan and the assessment seems to throw these types of scenarios.
From reading the guide I can only say that:
1) The development team are self managing so they should be able to bring in help if they choose.
2)The scrum master can help removes impediments - but that wasnt an option
3) The product owner can possibly help re-prioritise - but not sure why the product owner would need to be involved - possibly unless it was relating to reprioritising. Not sure who drives this decision and where accountability is.
4) Not sure how this situation is supposed to even happen because if the increment can be delivered then it wont meet the sprint goal.
I think I am confused coming from years of enterprise waterfall development. I cant seem to make sense of the situation.
My best guess at it would be that faced with not being able to deliver the increment they would do what ever it took i,e getting external advice or bringing in a specialist. This implies that they are self managing and accountable.